<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Win7 &#8211; Day2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.50micron.com/2009/06/16/win7-day2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2009/06/16/win7-day2/</link>
	<description>Ranting and raving about storage and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2009/06/16/win7-day2/comment-page-1/#comment-6827</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 22:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.50micron.com/?p=517#comment-6827</guid>
		<description>It didn&#039;t like mine, but then again, I&#039;ve come to understand that there is a difference between &quot;True&quot; 64-bit architecture, and what Intel calls 64-bit architecture.

I&#039;m running on a Core-2 Duo on my dell notebook, and it did in fact only report 3.2G usable in both the x86 and x64 versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn&#8217;t like mine, but then again, I&#8217;ve come to understand that there is a difference between &#8220;True&#8221; 64-bit architecture, and what Intel calls 64-bit architecture.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m running on a Core-2 Duo on my dell notebook, and it did in fact only report 3.2G usable in both the x86 and x64 versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryall</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2009/06/16/win7-day2/comment-page-1/#comment-6814</link>
		<dc:creator>ryall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 03:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.50micron.com/?p=517#comment-6814</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m loving Win7 so far, the 64bit version gives me access to the entirety of my 8Gb RAM. Those limits sound like you&#039;re running 32bit. The only problems I&#039;ve had is accessing the box via UltraVNC, so far no luck :(

COD4 only uses DirectX 9, so I doubt you&#039;ll see much performance increase there. Still a brilliant game though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m loving Win7 so far, the 64bit version gives me access to the entirety of my 8Gb RAM. Those limits sound like you&#8217;re running 32bit. The only problems I&#8217;ve had is accessing the box via UltraVNC, so far no luck <img src='http://blog.50micron.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>COD4 only uses DirectX 9, so I doubt you&#8217;ll see much performance increase there. Still a brilliant game though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

