Comments on: EMC Atmos http://blog.50micron.com/2009/04/04/emc-atmos/ Ranting and raving about storage and technology Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:36:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Storagezila http://blog.50micron.com/2009/04/04/emc-atmos/comment-page-1/#comment-6687 Storagezila Sun, 05 Apr 2009 01:37:22 +0000 http://www.50micron.com/?p=491#comment-6687 Centera had issues early on as people started using it for things it was never designed for. It was supposed to be nothing more than an optical media replacement. 80% write 20% read. Then people started buying it and using it for 50% Write 50% read scenarios. It took some time to scale the performance but now the code quality is much better. Centera had issues early on as people started using it for things it was never designed for. It was supposed to be nothing more than an optical media replacement. 80% write 20% read.

Then people started buying it and using it for 50% Write 50% read scenarios. It took some time to scale the performance but now the code quality is much better.

]]> By: Jesse http://blog.50micron.com/2009/04/04/emc-atmos/comment-page-1/#comment-6686 Jesse Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:40:30 +0000 http://www.50micron.com/?p=491#comment-6686 Something's gotta replace Centerra... Please god something..... Something’s gotta replace Centerra… Please god something…..

]]> By: Storagezila http://blog.50micron.com/2009/04/04/emc-atmos/comment-page-1/#comment-6685 Storagezila Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:36:15 +0000 http://www.50micron.com/?p=491#comment-6685 To address the whole CIFS thing Celerra also does compliance. I don't see Atmos replacing Centera. We've a much better idea than that... To address the whole CIFS thing Celerra also does compliance.

I don’t see Atmos replacing Centera. We’ve a much better idea than that…

]]>