<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slowly but surely I&#8217;m getting back into things&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.50micron.com/2007/06/14/slowly-but-surely-im-getting-back-into-things/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/06/14/slowly-but-surely-im-getting-back-into-things/</link>
	<description>Ranting and raving about storage and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/06/14/slowly-but-surely-im-getting-back-into-things/comment-page-1/#comment-6564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 05:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sangod.com/?p=145#comment-6564</guid>
		<description>There are two ways to do this.

1&gt; Using LVM you can activate the snap/clone, present the lun to the host, and re-import the VG which changes the PVID&#039;s of the disks.

2&gt; Not using LVM you simply activate the snap, re-present the lun to the host, re-scan the bus, and mount the new lun to a different directory.

That being said snapping a lun back to the same host seems counter-productive doesn&#039;t it?  The whole purpose would be to off-load the backup cycles to a different host, whereas this way you&#039;d be competing with production for CPU/Memory resources.

Be easier just to use the internal Snapshot capability of the LInux LVM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two ways to do this.</p>
<p>1> Using LVM you can activate the snap/clone, present the lun to the host, and re-import the VG which changes the PVID&#8217;s of the disks.</p>
<p>2> Not using LVM you simply activate the snap, re-present the lun to the host, re-scan the bus, and mount the new lun to a different directory.</p>
<p>That being said snapping a lun back to the same host seems counter-productive doesn&#8217;t it?  The whole purpose would be to off-load the backup cycles to a different host, whereas this way you&#8217;d be competing with production for CPU/Memory resources.</p>
<p>Be easier just to use the internal Snapshot capability of the LInux LVM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/06/14/slowly-but-surely-im-getting-back-into-things/comment-page-1/#comment-6563</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:39:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sangod.com/?p=145#comment-6563</guid>
		<description>Hi all,

I was looking around the web for EMC related information and came across this site. I have a question for all of the EMC gurus out there.

Has anyone successfully been able to take an EMC mirror/clone/snap taken from a Linux server and mount the mirror/clone/snap on the same server as the source volumes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,</p>
<p>I was looking around the web for EMC related information and came across this site. I have a question for all of the EMC gurus out there.</p>
<p>Has anyone successfully been able to take an EMC mirror/clone/snap taken from a Linux server and mount the mirror/clone/snap on the same server as the source volumes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

