<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comcast -</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.50micron.com/2007/04/30/comcast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/04/30/comcast/</link>
	<description>Ranting and raving about storage and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanGod</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/04/30/comcast/comment-page-1/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>SanGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sangod.com/?p=131#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>The vendor who sold this to me has assured me that this supports Many:Many Network Address Translation.

Not that I take Vendors at face value, but it&#039;s a good start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The vendor who sold this to me has assured me that this supports Many:Many Network Address Translation.</p>
<p>Not that I take Vendors at face value, but it&#8217;s a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/04/30/comcast/comment-page-1/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 21:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sangod.com/?p=131#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>I have a buddy with a netscreen.  The biggest problem he had was it would only route one external IP.  Here&#039;s hoping you didn&#039;t get the same model!  

As for me, I just got some new qwest DSL run to the house as well as my comcast.  Currently waiting on a cisco 1721 with a WIC-1ADSL card for that setup.  

I&#039;m still wondering why cisco never bothered to make a cable termination WIC.  Seemed like a no-brainer to me.  Then again, maybe they have and I just don&#039;t know about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a buddy with a netscreen.  The biggest problem he had was it would only route one external IP.  Here&#8217;s hoping you didn&#8217;t get the same model!  </p>
<p>As for me, I just got some new qwest DSL run to the house as well as my comcast.  Currently waiting on a cisco 1721 with a WIC-1ADSL card for that setup.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still wondering why cisco never bothered to make a cable termination WIC.  Seemed like a no-brainer to me.  Then again, maybe they have and I just don&#8217;t know about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SanGod</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/04/30/comcast/comment-page-1/#comment-1754</link>
		<dc:creator>SanGod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 07:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sangod.com/?p=131#comment-1754</guid>
		<description>Interesting - I know they have two modems associated, I&#039;ll have to check to make sure the old Linksys has been taken off.

I&#039;ve got a Juniper Networks firewall en-route.  I didn&#039;t want to mess with the WRT54Gv6, and really unfortunately don&#039;t have time to play with it.  But this is a many:many NAT with a hardware Firewall, so we&#039;ll see how it goes.  

Our security guy at work speaks highly of them, though he says not really for large enterprise applications (management is apparently not easy when you overgrow them)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting &#8211; I know they have two modems associated, I&#8217;ll have to check to make sure the old Linksys has been taken off.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a Juniper Networks firewall en-route.  I didn&#8217;t want to mess with the WRT54Gv6, and really unfortunately don&#8217;t have time to play with it.  But this is a many:many NAT with a hardware Firewall, so we&#8217;ll see how it goes.  </p>
<p>Our security guy at work speaks highly of them, though he says not really for large enterprise applications (management is apparently not easy when you overgrow them)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/04/30/comcast/comment-page-1/#comment-1751</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sangod.com/?p=131#comment-1751</guid>
		<description>Oh... one thing, *MAKE SURE* they remove the old mac address when you give them the new one.  I was down on three different occasions because they had multiple mac addresses in the system for my account.  Somehow something they were doing kept magically adding my old modem&#039;s mac back into the system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; one thing, *MAKE SURE* they remove the old mac address when you give them the new one.  I was down on three different occasions because they had multiple mac addresses in the system for my account.  Somehow something they were doing kept magically adding my old modem&#8217;s mac back into the system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.50micron.com/2007/04/30/comcast/comment-page-1/#comment-1750</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 19:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sangod.com/?p=131#comment-1750</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t have to do much of anything for the provisioning.  Just give em the mac address of the modem :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t have to do much of anything for the provisioning.  Just give em the mac address of the modem <img src='http://blog.50micron.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

